Thanks for posting that, very interesting stuff. This seems like a key quote as well:
Quote:
Valentine is nodding to the dawn of the revenue-sharing era. When NIL was the only way to pay athletes, schools such as Loyola Chicago were in a tough spot as compared with their wealthier peers. But the Atlantic 10 and other leagues that operate without the financial burden of Division I football could benefit from revenue-sharing rules. According to sources with knowledge of the current rev-share distributions, multiple A-10 teams have seven-figure coffers for men's basketball, with some of those schools surpassing the money available to programs in the Big Ten.
I also believe that after the ruling, NIL is becoming more of a boondoggle, as Deloitte has been tapped to create a clearinghouse that reviews NIL deals and has the power to deny them if deemed "fraudulent". Most assumed this clearinghouse would be pretty lenient, but apparently that's not the case, and it's frustrating a lot of P5s whose rev-share is gobbled up by football.
All of which is to say, right now seems to be a window for LUC and the A10 to make some waves -- though this window I'm sure won't last long, as P5's will throw their weight around one way or another. And as we are seeing the weak OOC schedules for A10 teams roll in, I'm thinking that may be a direct result of the P5 programs trying to exert power where they can. I really hope we hear an announcement about dynamic scheduling sooner than later from the A10, as it doesn't seem like talent will necessarily be the bottleneck against multiple bids, but opportunity.
It sucks that the P5 are shutting out the high MMs to game the NET, but I get why they are doing it. The A10 needs to play that game too, in the ways that are available to them. That they are maxing out rev-shares is a good sign, now they need to hit the throttle on the scheduling gamesmanship too.