ahunte1 wrote:
So, they first separate by wins against other teams with the same record and only then to go non-con SOS?
Yes.
The scenario I presented was four teams tied, two have a 4-2 record, two have a 2-4 record within the round robin. Evidently, they take the two 4-2 teams out, and use the head-to-head tiebreaker procedure for those two teams.
This is kind of interesting, because there's no "reward" for teams beating a higher seed within the conference, other than the win itself. For example, SIU's win against probable #2 seed Indiana State last night did nothing to help them in a tiebreaker if they end the season tied with any teams besides Indiana State. Likewise, our wins against UNI and MSU don't mean anything if we're tied with Evansville, Drake, and SIU-- other than the fact that we got into a tie with those teams because of a win. In this sense, you're better off winning the games you're supposed to win than going off one or two nights and upsetting top teams. Hence, our loss at home to SIU was much more damaging than our home win against UNI or Missouri State was beneficial.
Bottom line now is Saturday's game agains SIU is HUGE, and so are the games against Evansville and Drake. Better for us from a tiebreaker standpoint if we beat Drake in Iowa than UNI.