JCT wrote:
Yes I know losing to Chicago State is embarrassing. We lost to them once before sometime around 1999 under Larry Farmer (a coach who had previous coaching experience at UCLA). In 2024, Chicago State beat Northwestern (who, as an at-large team that year, was knocked out of the 2nd round of the NCAA Tournament by eventual Champ UConn). So, it happens, even to teams that are/were much better than we are this season.
My only point is that despite this season being an EPIC CATASTROPHE thru the first 11 games, you can't make hiring and firing decisions based on any stretch of 11 games where the coach keeps his pants on, doesn't kill anyone, and continues to stand upright.
Last season we were in the semifinals of the NIT in Indianapolis. Has everyone forgotten that? In four plus years as head coach, Valentine has 3 seasons with 23 wins or more, one trip to the NCAA, two trips to the NIT (including a semifinal appearance), one A-10 regular season title, an MVC Championship, and an 86-59 overall record. We went 30 years without a postseason game. That streak ended only 10 years ago with a CIT championship. And now you want to fire a guy who's got those credentials..... because of Mercyhurst and Chicago State?
At least try to figure out if the guy has a theory or an answer as to why this season has gone so badly. Admitting oversight of two or three factors and saying it's a lesson learned would--- to me, at least--- be a no-brainer for keeping his job and getting whatever resources needed to fill the gap. Only if he denied there's a problem or blamed it on the players would I seriously consider thinking about a replacement.
We've made a big investment over the past 5 years in Valentine, and it would be stupid to throw away the progress he's made. The recruits are high level. Most of the transfers have been positive. Granted, it's freaking RARE for a program to drop to such a terrible level of performance given the budget and the recent history of the program. We have two really encouraging freshmen (Love, Anderson), and the respectable number of key returning players (Rubin, Moore, Housinou, Glasnov)--- why they have regressed or not developed is a big question mark.
There was also some late in the cycle turnover and a restructuring (didn't we drop the emeritus coach?) of the assistants. So.... bring in another old guy (I use the term being comfortable as an old guy), and zero in on a reliable, hot top assistant for next year?
I guess the counterpoint would be that, if it's true that he is that reliant on assistants, doesn't that raise some serious questions about his coaching ability?
That can be related to your other arguments as well -- for as high as the talent level appears to be (no doubt that Drew is an impressive recruiter), and how well the team performed at the end of last year... for the team to have cratered so much since then doesn't add up. To me it suggests that either assistants like Dwyer were doing most of the heavy lifting in terms of Xs and Os (and that Drew is unusually terrible at that), or Drew has lost some kind of institutional control over the team -- maybe both.
I am sympathetic to your argument for patience, since we've seen it before, and the team has turned around. But even in the good seasons, we've cratered in the noncon, and at a certain point that's just not acceptable either, no matter how well we end up playing in conference. This year in particular I seriously doubt can be resuscitated, but we'll see. If not I just don't see how Drew doesn't get canned.
We'd likely be starting from scratch either way from a talent perspective, and I'm guessing donors would actually be less willing to continue to fork over cash if they stick with Drew.