swellafelon wrote:
I can't believe I am coming to JC64's defense, but I do think people should show a little more tolerance for dissenting views, and try not to inject partisan politics into every discussion of the pandemic.
I wrote nothing about politics in my comment, let alone partisan politics.
Here is my comment in full:
Quote:
So tiresome. Every day it goes on, no matter how discredited the "I don't need no stinkin' mask" attitude becomes.
Where did I discuss politics? What was partisan about my comment?
Perhaps you think there is a partisan political connection behind wearing a mask and/or encouraging that everyone wears a 75-cent face and nose mask in the middle of a pandemic. I think it's something that should be done by people as a matter of courtesy toward others. Texas had 322 deaths from Covid-19 yesterday. Florida had 252. California, which shut down early, had success and then frittered away all their hard work by opening everything too early, had 114 deaths yesterday and passed New York in total cases last week. Nationwide, there were 1465 deaths yesterday. Two of these states have Republican leadership, and one has Democratic leadership.
Tell me which part of my quote was "[in}tolerance for dissenting views?" Why are dangerous practices that threaten to infect others with diseases and lengthen the pandemic just "dissenting views?" We require people to wear seat belts. We require people to wear pants in public. I guess if you run every stop sign, you're merely expressing a dissenting view...
Show me, like I'm a 10-year old child, exactly where I "inject[ed] partisan politics" into it. Please, show me where, because I can't find it....
swellafelon wrote:
JC64 said nothing about masks, either directly or by implication.
Please show where I mentioned politics, either directly or "by implication."
swellafelon wrote:
JCT's reply came straight out of LEFT field and is a dishonest distortion of 64's post. I don't know what 64's position is on masks and neither does JCT.
I say your reply to my message was a dishonest distortion of my post. Now you know what my position is. Here's a summary...
If the US had adopted mask-wearing and followed its coordinated national shutdown with masking and social distancing, we wouldn't have to worry about whether we'd be playing outdoor sports in the fall. We might even have non-con college basketball this fall/winter.
But instead, we as a society went with happy talk. We went with "reductio ad absurdum arguments." We went with wishing it away, every state for themselves, magic miracle cures, miracle medicines, "why don't we try to achieve herd immunity?", ignoring the problem, second-guessing the scientists, not speaking of the problem, not thinking about the problem, dismissing it because only certain demographics were being impacted, smack talking other states, and letting politicians try to politicize it all.
Obviously, the 150,000 dead, 4 million sick, 50 million applying for unemployment and the economy crippled still hasn't become quite terrible enough to develop a frickin' consensus, listen to doctors, and follow through to get this nightmare over with.