ToledoRambler wrote:
I’m not saying the turnovers shouldn’t be a concern, but I think a lot of us are dismissing the insane amount of talent and experience of the opponent, merely because their jerseys said “FAU” and not “ Arizona,” “ Kentucky,” “ North Carolina,” or “Gonzaga,” who coincidentally are all teams FAU is ranked ahead of. All five starters returned, and have 40+ games of experience playing together in their system. That’s tough to beat. Imagine if Krutwig would’ve came back after 2021, and that’s basically the type of veteran talent FAU has this year. We would have been a top 10 team as well if we had Norris, Uguak, Williamson, Clemons, Krutwig, Hall, Kennedy and Schwieger and Chris Knight in 2022. We certainly would have gotten out of the first round of the NCAA tournament. He probably would’ve been a four or five seed.
Combine the talent and experience they had with all our newcomers in game 1, and it’s easy to see why we should lose this game by 13. It’s a shame we didn’t get to play this one 5 games into the season when we have a more established rotation. We might be only 4 or 5 points slower than them. You insert a brand name team in for FAU, and I think we would all feel decent with the result of the game, considering our guys and it being their first game together.
There may be a time to panic, but I don’t think right now is that time. This is not a bad loss.
Agreed. The game against Creighton might tell us how much we learn and improve from this one.